Khrushchev was succeeded by Leonid Il’ich Brezhnev, whose
revolutionary commitments were weak but whose political skills were strong. He
was committed to maintaining internal stability by ensuring that key interest
groups were happy. In the military’s case, that meant immense financial and
material resources and a free hand in running its affairs. While Khrushchev had
controlled military spending by building nuclear weapons at the expense of
conventional weapons, Brezhnev instead offered the military everything it might
want. Under two defense ministers, Andrei Antonovich Grechko (1967–1976) and
then the industrial manager Dmitrii Fyodorovich Ustinov (1976–1984), the Soviet
military did very well. Avoiding hard choices about budgets and priorities
avoided conflict, but put an increasingly unsustainable burden on the Soviet
economy.
The prime beneficiary of this was the Soviet navy, which
finally won the resources it had been denied for essentially the lifetime of
the Soviet Union. During the interwar period, the Soviet Union could not afford
a navy, and its key geostrategic goals required only the ability to defend its
coastlines, not project power by sea. Despite a brief flirtation by Stalin with
the idea of a capital ship navy in the mid-1930s, the Soviet Union had never
been a naval power. Under Khrushchev, however, the Soviet Union began to act as
a world power. This new policy of active engagement in the developing world was
not matched, however, by a navy capable of delivering power projection. Only
after Khrushchev’s 1964 ouster, in the free-spending atmosphere of the Brezhnev
era, was Gorshkov able to build a navy of the size and power he desired. Even
then, the Soviet Union never matched the American navy. Its ballistic missile
submarine fleet was, for example, far less important to its nuclear forces than
the American fleet was, and it never possessed a vessel equivalent to an
American attack carrier. The Soviets did develop the Moskva class helicopter
carrier for antisubmarine warfare in the early 1960s. At the beginning of the
1970s, the larger Kiev class followed, capable of carrying vertical takeoff
aircraft in addition to helicopters. Only a handful were built, and neither
compared in size or striking power to American carriers.
No comments:
Post a Comment